As if the idea of a foreign object shifting around was not bad enough, a recent finding in the case of one of the plaintiffs about the medical device implanted in her shows that it not only moves around in one location causing havoc but migrates to other parts of the body. The former is the main complaint against the contraceptive product Mirena, an intrauterine device (IUD) that was said to cause vaginal hemorrhages and uterine perforation when it shifted from where it was supposed. The latter, though, puts a new curl in the problem.
Mirena is an IUD device manufactured and distributed by pharmaceutical company Bayer Healthcare. It was approved for use in the US in 2000 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and they have received more than 45,000 reports of adverse effects so far. The most common include vaginal hemorrhage, pan, and entrenchment in the uterine walls. In the case mentioned above, the plaintiff had the Mirena IUD inserted but became pregnant two months later anyway. In an ultrasound and later exploratory surgery after the plaintiff miscarried, there was no sign of the device. It was later found in the plaintiff’s rectum during an exam.
This is a disturbing development, indicating that not only is Mirena ineffective as a contraceptive, but can do irreparable harm when implanted because of the risk of migration. The plaintiff in the above case is claiming that the device is defective and that Bayer knew about the risks but failed to warn patients and doctors adequately about them. There are also a few women who are alleging that Mirena also has an increased risk for causing neurological problems such as vision impairment and headaches, but the majority of cases center around the perforation and migration issues until a more definitive link can be established for neurological conditions.
If you have suffered any serious injury from using Mirena, you may be eligible for compensation. Find a Mirena lawyer in your area with experiencing in handling defective medical devices and get the lowdown on product liability lawsuits.
We are creatures of the mind, and when something happens that damages the brain in some way, the consequences are often far-reaching and unpredictable. Scientists are only being to understand how the brain works, but certainly not to the extent that they can treat or reverse traumatic brain injury (TBI) with any reliability. As pointed out on the website of the Sampson Law Firm in Louisville, in most cases TBI sufferers and their families merely endure and cope with the neurological, economic, and social repercussions as best they can.
TBI often results from sudden impact or trauma that results in a blow to the head or the momentary shifting of the brain within the skull. The severity of TBI ranges from the mild to the catastrophic, but even mild TBI (MTBI) can be problematic. Immediately following a head injury, the following may occur:
- Loss of consciousness
- Pre- and/or post-traumatic amnesia up to 24 hours
- Changes in mental state at the time of the traumatic event
One of the most common MTBI is concussion, some of which resolve on its own with no persistent symptoms but in most cases have long-term consequences. Early symptoms of concussion include:
- Headache and dizziness
When a patient is discharged after a requisite observation period depending on the severity of the trauma, later symptoms may surface and persist for a long time indicative of neurological damage. These include but not limited to:
- Problems with memory
- Difficulty in concentrating
- Degeneration of skills and competence
- Low grade headaches
- Sensitivity to light and sounds
- Chronic fatigue
- Depression and anxiety
It is not difficult to imagine how hard it is living with the consequences of even MTBI, and sufferers may not even be aware that these are manifestations of concussion because they are not specific to the condition, so they may not get a proper diagnosis. Even MRIs and CT scans will not reveal MTBI; it is only through a reading of the patient’s medical history that the conglomeration of symptoms may point the way to MTBI and the appropriate treatment.
If you have suffered traumatic brain injury even “mild” types in a negligent accident, you should be aware that all may not be well in the long term. Consult with a traumatic brain injury lawyer in your area to advise you on what you need to do to ensure you won’t continue to be a victim of a third party’s negligence.
Driving under the influence (DUI) or driving while intoxicated (DWI) always puts many lives at risk: the driver’s, the pedestrians’ and other motorists’ lives. Both federal and state authorities and traffic enforcers are always on the watch for drunken drivers due to the danger they present on US roads and highways. And in the hope to curb motor vehicle accidents, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) makes sure that car drivers, who register a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) level of 0.08% (for commercial vehicle drivers, like truck drivers, the limit is 0.04 %, while for those below 21 years old, it’s zero tolerance), are apprehended and charged.
DUI or DWI is a very serious offense in many states. Besides the hefty fines, imprisonment, compulsory attendance in a DUI class and/or community service, a driver charged with and convicted of DUI can suffer suspension or revocation of his/her license (especially those involving serious accidents where a victim may end up severely injured or dead). A serious driving offense, including failure to carry auto liability insurance, can even mean requirement to fill out an SR-22 form, which usually lasts for three years and which requires higher insurance premiums.
An SR-22 is a form sent by the insurance provider to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) of the state where the convicted driver resides, to prove that such driver already carries liability insurance. A new traffic violation by the driver, within the three year SR-22 coverage, can enable to state to decide for an extension of the SR-22 requirement.
Many drivers, who end up being charged and convicted of DUI, are first-time offenders, however. They are usually people, who simply spent great time with friends, colleagues or family and decided to drive home. While risking the lives of other people via driving while drunk may never have been in their least thought, still they will have to answer for the unlawful mistake they have committed.
The many negative effects of being arrested, charged and convicted of a crime, though, goes well beyond the court room. These negative effects are too great, in fact, that these can destroy one’s future personal and professional life. Thus, many are willing to do anything to avoid conviction. But while others try to run away from the law, complicating the situation even more, some bank on the competence of lawyers, whose knowledge and understanding of the law may save them from being convicted. An Austin criminal lawyer is one legal expert those facing conviction can always turn to; having him/her for an ally in the courtroom can benefit the accused in ways no other lawyer can.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and other government and private organizations have always indicated and explained why car accidents are avoidable occurrences. Negligence, which leads to inattentiveness and/or recklessness, is always the number one reason why millions of drivers, motorcycle and bicycle riders, and pedestrians continue to be severely injured or killed on US roads; but negligence can easily be prevented.
This very critical failure to ensure that nothing is amiss can lead: to a car manufacturer selling a defective vehicle or sub-standard vehicular parts; local government agencies or federal government channels in ensuring that US roads and bridges are well built, maintained and repaired if with defects; and, drivers violating traffic safety rules by drinking while under the influence of alcohol, overspeeding, driving recklessly, using a handheld phone while driving and allowing distractions to get the better of him/her while behind the wheel.
There may only be a minor number of drivers who have driven through a red light, never slowed down or stopped where there are signs stating these, have made dangerous, improper overtakes, never used signal lights and/or tailgated another vehicle. But definitely, almost all drivers, whatever type of vehicle they handle, have been distracted while on the road.
According to Lexington personal injury lawyers, distracted driving is characterized by the diversion of a driver’s attention from the road due to another activity. Some of these activities can be:
- Conversing with a passenger
- Reading a map for directions
- Using a navigation system
- Watching a video
- Adjusting a radio, CD player, or any portable electronic device
Driving distractions are so normal that a driver, most often than not, will never even realize that he/she is already being distracted. While driving, one’s attention should be focused just on the road – a rule that every driver knows, but which many only continue to know. Any distraction can endanger the driver, his/her passenger/s, pedestrians and all other motorists on the road. There are more than 3,000 deaths and about 400,000 injuries annually due to distracted driving, according to the NHTSA and CDC.
According to the website of San Antonio personal injury lawyers, victims have the legal right to sue those liable for the accident, for the compensation that they deserve due to the harm they have been made to suffer.
If a car accident involves a victim, who may be in the course of performing his/her job, then such victim can benefit greatly from the competent advice of a Raleigh workers’ compensation lawyers, whose expertise and dedication in fighting for workers’ right to compensation cannot be questioned.
Well, putting aside the issue of compensation, those who continue to act negligently on the road (or sometimes in a working environment) should realize that if they injure or kill someone due to their negligence, the life of the victim, and of his/her family, can be changed forever – a change that no amount of money can compensate. Negligence is the absence of care, leading to accidents which are definitely preventable. It wouldn’t hurt if one were to start caring for others.
The US Bankruptcy Code Law provides individuals and businesses with legal solutions that will save them from overwhelming debts to enable them to regain financial control and stability. Parts of the solution involve discharge of all unsecured debts and an affordable means of paying secured (usually government-related) debts.
Municipalities, corporations, and millions of Americans in financial crisis, have, over the past years, resorted to filing bankruptcy due to the many advantages and benefits it offers. Based on the amount of their loans and economic situation (considering their income, assets and properties), they can choose which chapter of the bankruptcy code would be most appropriate for them.
These chapters include: Chapter 7, also known as liquidation of assets; Chapter 11, or business reorganization; Chapter 12, which is designed for families in the farming or fishing business; and, Chapter 13, which is payment of debt via a three-year, more affordable, payment plan.
Besides the discharge of unsecured debts (such as from credit card companies) or reorganization for a more affordable debt-payment scheme, there is also the “automatic stay,” which is another major benefit of filing for bankruptcy. This benefit specifically stops repossession of properties, foreclosures, evictions, utility shut-offs, and any attempt by creditors or collecting agencies to sue debtors and force the sale of their personal property or garnish their bank account.
A good business lawyer, however, would not immediately recommend the filing of bankruptcy to a client without first discussing with him/her its advantages and disadvantages. For while bankruptcy may discharge a client from unsecured debts and enable the payment of secured loans, it can also mean loss of some properties, closure of business, a bankruptcy stigma that will remain on one’s credit report for 10 years, and possible higher interest rates on future credits.
The website of Ryan J. Ruehle, LLC, shares an article which gives clients another debt-payment option that is more manageable than what bankruptcy chapters offer. This is debt negotiation which, as the article explains, can reduce interest payments, lengthen the time span of payment, defer interest payments, or consolidate loan payments.
A debt negotiation scheme can reduce the loan to even more than half of the total amount, giving the debtor a much smaller amount to settle. Its other advantages include:
- No more litigation process (which is part of the bankruptcy process)
- Debt may be paid through a single/lump sum payment or monthly payments
- Freedom from being harassed by debt collectors
- Freedom from lawsuits and any other legal action that will force sale of properties, wage garnishment or a bank account being levied.
Other may reason out that even debt negotiation would have an effect in one’s credit score. This is true, but the effect is much less substantial than when one files bankruptcy and, to begin with, one’s credit rating will already have been affected negatively after a six-month delinquency in payment – this is even before debt negotiation starts.
Probably, the only one great disadvantage of debt negotiation is payment of taxes if the amount taken away by creditors from the loan exceeds $600. This benefit (or non-benefit for some) is called the cancellation-of-debt (COD) income.
To be more certain about which legal solution a client should opt for (bankruptcy or debt negotiation), it is recommended that the advice and guidance of an expert lawyer is sought. This is to make sure that the best option is chosen and that proper procedures are followed.
The two largest programs of the Federal government that provide financial assistance to people with disabilities are the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and the Supplemental Security Income. The former was introduced by the Social Security Administration (SSA) in 1956, while the latter was created in 1974.
SSDI pays benefits to totally disabled insured members, aged 65 or below (and to certain members of their families), assuming that these members meet the following requirements, which include:
- Having worked long enough (or recently enough) and have paid Social Security taxes or Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes while employed (these taxes are automatically deducted from the worker on a monthly basis)
- Having earned the number of credits required by the SSA (workers earn four credits annually)
- Suffering from totally disability (SSA expects that workers will receive assistance for short-term or partial disability from the Workers’ Compensation Insurance benefit or from their personal insurance providers).
Total disability or disability, as considered by the SSA, means: (i) inability to perform previous work, as well as any other work, due to the medical condition; (ii) the disability has either lasted for a year or is likely to last for a year or more; and, (iii) the disability can result in the worker’s death.
SSA has drawn up a list medical conditions that are severe enough, so that finding one’s health problem in it would automatically include him/her in the roster of disabled insured SS members. Not finding one’s health condition in the list, however, will require an evaluation by Social Security, to determine if the problem is serious enough to be considered a disability.
The Supplemental Security Income (SSI) disability program, as different from SSDI, provides non-taxable financial assistance to Americans, who are, at least, 65 years old , blind, or disabled (the meaning assigned to “disability” is the same with SSDI), and whose income or resources fall within the federal benefit rate (FBR) determined by the government.
SSI funding is sourced from the U.S. Treasury general funds (not from the SS taxes paid monthly by SS insured members), thus, neither SS credits nor previous employment is required from applicants to the program.
The main intent of the SSI program is to help provide for the basic needs (food, shelter and clothing) of its beneficiaries. In some states SSI benefits application is also considered as application for food stamps, while other states allow the benefits to be supplemented by Medicaid to cover prescriptions, doctor’s fee and other medical care costs.
Many individuals, despite meeting the conditions required by Social Security Administration to qualify either for the SSDI or SSI benefit, have been denied of their application greatly because they chose to go through the whole process on their own. The forms that need to be filled out, the medical proofs, all other necessary documents and the strictness imposed by Social Security in deciding the worthiness of each application, can all be very difficult to take care of without the assistance of a legal professional. An Indiana Social Security disability lawyer is a person to approach to help a benefits applicant get approval for the financial assistance he or she needs.
For millions of Americans suffering from epilepsy, bipolar disorder or migraine headache, U.S. FDA-approved Depakote served to be a great relief for their debilitating health conditions. Depakote, an anticonvulsant drug, was approved by the FDA: in 1983 to reduce or prevent severe epileptic seizures; in 1995 to treat manic episodes linked to bipolar disorder; and, in 1996 to prevent migraine attacks. In the US alone, about 125,000 individuals are added annually to the more than two million Americans already suffering from epilepsy, while those affected by migraine number to more than 20 million. The drug’s effectiveness in treating the health concerns it was approved for eventually made it one of the most prescribed drugs in the nation.
Abbott Laboratories, maker of Depakote, was soon faced with reports and lawsuits due to adverse cases associated with its drug. Some of the recorded severe effects of Depakote are pancreatitis, liver toxicity, confusion, unusual bruising or bleeding, joint weakness, difficulty swallowing and/or breathing, and so many others.
The most serious health conditions caused by Depakote, though, can be those found in babies, whose mothers were prescribed with the drug during their pregnancy. Women, who took the drug, were in a great chance of delivering dead babies of babies with birth defects, like facial dysmorphism (deformity in a child’s facial structure), spina bifida (a condition wherein the spinal column of an unborn child does not close totally), deformity of the cardiovascular system, and brain defect, which can be fatal.
Depakote, however, was not the only drug (for bipolar disorder) introduced in the early 90s that was prescribed to millions of individuals, but which also caused severe harm to those who used it. Another drug was Risperdal – approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1994 to treat symptoms of schizophrenia, autism and bipolar disorder.
Due to its effectivity, Risperdal ended up being prescribed for non-label use too (not approved by the FDA), namely, for obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention deficit disorder (ADD) in children, anxiety and depression, behavioral disorder, Tourette syndrome (a neurological disorder typified by uncontrollable utterance of obscenities, vocalizations, and involuntary tics.
Before 2003, 16 cases of deaths and 37 incidences of strokes or stroke-like occurrences were linked to Risperdal. Besides these, there were also reports of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS), which is a potentially deadly condition characterized by irregularity in pulse and blood pressure, and Tardive Dyskinesia, which is a disorder in the central nervous system that leads to twitching of the tongue and face and uncontrolled movements of the limbs, as having been caused by the drug.
Both Abbott Laboratories and Janssen-Cilag, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, manufacturers of Depakote and Risperdal, respectively, have faced, and are still facing, thousands of lawsuits from individuals who have been harmed by the drugs.
While those harmed by the said drugs can still file claims lawsuits against the manufacturers, being represented by a highly competent lawyer, like a Depakote lawyer or a Risperdal lawyer, may easily sway the judge’s decision to benefit the victim and award to him/her the maximum amount of compensation allowed by the law.
Anyone who has worked very hard to finally afford his/her own vehicle (for the first time) would undoubtedly go through the experience of buying the vehicle with so much excitement; well, the person deserves it and it can be one form of rewarding oneself for the hard work.
When choosing a vehicle, however, one mistake that so many commit is focusing only on peripheral factors, like color, finish, brand, model, design and so forth. If an expert’s advice were to be solicited, the one sure thing he/she would recommend is a vehicle (whether a car, a pickup, an SUV, or any other type) that is safe.
One car safety feature that is now a standard in many vehicles, since August 2011, is the electronic stability control system (ESC), which was designed to give drivers greater vehicle control, lessening the possibility of road accidents, especially rollovers. The ESC is a very important feature particularly in SUVs since this type of vehicle is more susceptible to rolling over as its center of gravity is higher from the ground compared to a regular car.
Through the use of intelligent sensors, the ESC system is able to detect loss of vehicle control (like when the vehicle skids) and simultaneously applies an automatic brake to the appropriate wheel to put the vehicle back under the control of the driver. Tests have also showed that ESC effectively: corrects imminent understeering or oversteering; improves handling on gravel patches, like road shoulders; stabilizes the vehicle during sudden maneuvers, such as when making a sudden turn on sharp curves; and, improves traction on slippery and icy surfaces.
Habush Habush & Rottier S.C.® points out that safety on the road is dependent on different factors; there is driver behavior, repaired and well-maintained roads, vehicle and vehicle parts that meet government and industry standards, and environmental factors, which include weather condition. Thus, the beneficial aspects of ESC can be negated if these factors, especially driver behavior, are taken for granted. For it would be very unlikely for a driver to regain control of his/her vehicle, despite its being equipped with the ESC, if he/she were fatigued, distracted, intoxicated, tailgating, making reckless lane changes, or overspeeding. Likewise, driving on icy and slippery roads with worn out tires will not make ESC create the needed traction.
Rollover accidents have caused so many serious injuries, including back injuries, quadriplegia, paraplegia, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord damage and death. Sometimes, though, it can be hard to determine who the real liable party in a rollover accident is; it can the driver, the manufacturer of the vehicle or those responsible in maintaining the road. Massachusetts car accident lawyers would probably inform you that it can be very important to identify who the liable party is. Seeking compensation from this person can help you get back on your feet.
Some people may feel bad about suing an individual or company after an injury, worried that their lawsuit will bankrupt them. Actually, in some situations, payouts come from insurance companies. Having information on car insurance and accident liability can arm you to handle your accident in a way that is level-headed and successful.